The War of 1812

On 18 June 1812, the United States declared war on Great Britain. The vote was the closest in American history: 79–49 in the House, 19–13 in the Senate. Every Federalist member of Congress voted against. New England, the nation’s commercial heartland, was overwhelmingly opposed. The country went to war divided. And it would fight divided.

The grievances were genuine and longstanding. The Royal Navy had been stopping American merchant vessels and removing sailors claimed as British subjects, a practice known as impressment which struck at the core of American sovereignty. Britain’s Orders in Council restricted neutral trade with Napoleonic Europe, damaging American commerce. And among the “War Hawks” in Congress, notably Henry Clay of Kentucky, John C. Calhoun of South Carolina, there was a conviction that the conquest of British Canada would be swift, popular, and strategically decisive.

What followed over the next thirty-one months defied every American expectation. Three invasions of Canada were repelled. The Royal Navy imposed a blockade that reduced American exports from $61 million to $7 million, rendering the war financially unsustainable. A British expeditionary force entered Washington, D.C. and burned the Capitol, the President’s House, and every major government building, in direct retaliation for the American burning of York and Newark. The American frigate navy, after a series of striking early victories that rattled British confidence, was progressively swept from the sea: every American frigate that challenged the blockade after June 1813 was captured.

The Americans fought well in places. Winfield Scott's regulars proved at Chippawa that professional American infantry could stand against British veterans. Perry won a decisive action on Lake Erie. Macdonough's innovative tactics at Plattsburgh turned back a powerful British invasion. Jackson's defence of New Orleans, though fought after the peace treaty was signed, was a devastating tactical victory. As Lambert himself acknowledges: "The officers and men performed far better than their feeble government had any right to expect. The seamanship of Isaac Hull, the courage of James Lawrence, and the determination of Thomas Macdonough were worthy of a better cause." He adds: "No other navy did half as well against the British in this period, so defeat was no disgrace." These were genuine achievements. They did not change the war's outcome.

The Treaty of Ghent, signed on Christmas Eve 1814, restored every boundary to its pre-war position. The status quo ante bellum. It did not mention impressment. It did not address neutral trading rights. It did not reference the Orders in Council. Every issue over which the United States had declared war was simply dropped from the final settlement. The treaty reflected, in every particular, what Great Britain had been defending since June 1812.

The war’s clearest losers were not among the treaty’s signatories. The Indigenous nations of the Great Lakes and the Old Northwest, led by Tecumseh’s confederacy, which had fought alongside Britain, were devastated. Tecumseh was killed at the Thames in 1813. His confederacy collapsed. The destruction of organised Indigenous resistance opened the continent to American expansion. It was the war’s most consequential outcome, and the one least discussed in conventional accounts.

Read the full overview →